Tag Archives: Constitution Party

Trump, Cruz – Patriots or Partners with World Elite?

A recent Breitbart article captured my attention with the headline “Bill Kristol has Strategy to Give White House to Hilary IF Trump Should Win!” Now why would a leading Republican voice want to risk dismantling the GOP by helping the party lose to a criminal democrat who should really be behind  bars?  The true reason behind this declaration needs a closer inspection.

According to the Breibart report William (Bill) Kristol, the editor-in-chief of the Weekly Standard, was on MSNBC’s Morning Joe discussing Donald Trump’s campaign.  Kristol boasted he had a plan to deprive Trump of the 50% delegates required to secure the Republican nomination and force a brokered convention. He further declared that his scheme included cutting a deal which awards enough delegates to an “acceptable” candidate.  He also told Joe Scarborough that “we” have to stop the momentum and ensure Trump loses in both Florida and Ohio in order to keep the race open for another candidate to gain the nomination.

For the past few years the registered Republican numbers were on decline, however since Trump entered the race for POTUS, the numbers are once again increasing.  In fact the numbers are up a full 7% with larger than expected voter turnout for the primaries.  Logically would it not benefit the party to support such an historic populist front-runner?  It appears that the voting majority disagree with Bill about “the Donald” not being an “acceptable” candidate, so why did he state “we” must stop the momentum (of WE the People)?  The answers become apparent after a deeper investigation.

washgconconvjuniusbrutusstearnsvamu

First, besides operating The Weekly Standard, who is Bill Kristol?  Bill was also the Co-Founder of Project for the New America Century a neoconservative think tank based in Washington DC with the stated goal of “promoting  American global leadership” via wars and aggressive foreign policies.  Quite the contrast of George Washington’s sage advice in his farewell speech in which he firmly stated “Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all”, in addition: “It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world.”  Washington’s speech should be read in entirety by all Americans to confirm that he believed true liberty meant not being aggressive with other countries, but instead not entangle with foreign alliances and focus on the sovereignty of the Republic. Yet the Project’s other co-founder, Robert Kagan, defined himself as “a liberal interventionist”.  Others who signed or funded the New America Century included former Vice-President Dick Cheney, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and media mogul Rupert Murdoch (FOX News). PNAC released a statement back in June 1997 which included the following statement:

“We need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future; we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values; we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad; we need to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order…”

Although some Americans may believe the statement sounds positive, this was not the vision the Founding Fathers laid forth. For instance in 1799 Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter advising

“I am for free commerce with all nations, political connection with none, and little or no diplomatic establishment. And I am not for linking ourselves by new treaties with the quarrels of Europe, entering that field of slaughter to preserve their balance, or joining in the confederacy of Kings to war against the principles of liberty.”

Clearly PNAC’s goal was the complete opposite of the Founder’s intentions. So where did PNAC’s ideas originate?  Bill Kristol’s very own father, the late Irving Kristol was nicknamed “the Godfather of Neoconservatism”a label he proudly wore.

CHANGING AMERICAN POLITICS

Irving Kristol was born in 1920, Brooklyn, New York to Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe. He was schooled with and supported radical socialism in the 1930s.  He later would become a contributing writer to “Commentary” which was a liberal Jewish Monthly Review magazine.  “Commentary” provided the intellectual roots for neoconservatism.  He also was an active member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

The neocon movement was formerly established in the 1960s by a group of socialist democrats which included both Irving and Max Shactman who was a prominent member of the Communist Party USA and considered a leading Marxist theorist.  However this group of socialist-communist democrats rejected the hippie counterculture movement and decided to vacate the democrat party and infiltrate the republican party instead.

By 1979 the neoconservative movement had gained notoriety and became the basis of the book released that year titled The Neo-Conservatives: The Men who are Changing America’s Politics.  Irving was prominently featured in the book.  When he was asked “What is Neo-Conservatism?”, he answered “it is not ideology but persuasion” and that neocons were truthfully “a liberal who has been mugged by reality”.

New World Order

Why did American politics need to change?  Neocons may occasionally refer to the Constitution which is the foundation of our politics but their agenda is clearly not Constitutional.  Since the Founding Documents are supposed to be our politics which formed a limited government model espousing the ideals of individual freedom and liberty, then what did they “change” in our form of government?  Former President George H.W. Bush, a neocon, announced in a state of the union speech, “We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and future generations a new world order……….an order in which an incredible United Nations can use its peace keeping role to fulfill its promise and vision of the UN’s founders.” He did not affirm to keep the promise and vision of the Republic’s Founding Fathers, but instead the UN’s.

The United Nation’s is a one world government organization promoting “international cooperation”and was established after World War II to replace The League of Nations.  During his Nobel Peace Prize speech, United States Diplomat Ralph Bunche sounded “It is worthy of emphasis that the United Nations exists not merely to preserve the peace but also to make change – even radical change..”    Years later Americans would be bombarded with the word “change” during Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign stating “Yes we can”.

Thomas Jefferson and company established America to be a country in which the people governed and were represented by individuals who defended the people’s rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness without government dictatorship.  In fact, Jefferson confirmed by stating:

“A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference.”

Continue reading

Advertisements

The Dream Police of the United States of Amerika

……..I try to sleep, they’re wide awake, they won’t let me alone
They don’t get paid to take vacations or let me alone
They spy on me, I try to hide, they won’t let me alone
They persecute me, they’re the judge and jury all in one………

The year 1984 may have passed 3 decades ago, however the Orwellian story could easily be renamed 2014.  As this year comes to a close, we are faced with a daily barrage of “big brother” news from a Sheriff Deputy in Washington state declaring armored vehicles are needed because of “constitutionalists” to alleged threats from North Korean hackers shutting down a release of a movie.

Nearly 3/4 of a century ago, Charlie Chaplin released his classic and popular film “The Dictator” to rave reviews and box office strength.  Although it has been reported that Hitler was annoyed and controversy was stirred, Americans did not bow to fascist threats.  But in today’s modern world of ‘political correctness’, propaganda, easily “offended” individuals, and encroaching tyranny, America bent over.

The lack of Presidential leadership and the caving of theater chains to not release the Sony film “The Interview” displays weakness of the United States to the rest of the world.  Our country allowed “dictatorship” from foreign entities to silence us.  Is this still America?

One week ago Congress passed the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 which included the granting of rights for the Executive branch to have unlimited access to the communications of ALL Americans.

In addition, another film made headlines earlier this week due to new technology called “Beware”.. The 2002 Steven Spielberg film, “The Minority Report” showed the story of police utilizing ‘thought’ technology to arrest and convict people before committing crimes.  Now the telecommunications company Intrado has developed a “pre-crime” software which can search billions of records, like social media, to ‘find’ and ‘predict’ POTENTIAL crimes.

Even without Intrado’s constitutional violation software, Marine Veteran Brandon Raub made headlines back in the summer of 2012 when FBI, Secret Service, and County Sheriffs swarmed onto Raub’s private property.  His alleged crime?  Postings on his facebook page which were deemed “anti-government”.  So what is considered anti-government?

Three years prior, the MIAC report (Missouri Information Analysis Center) was discovered when a law enforcement whistle-blower sent the document to the Alex Jones show.  The ‘unclassified’ but ‘law enforcement sensitive’ document declared that 2008 Presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr and their supporters were threats.  In addition any individual who supports the Constitution, but opposes the North American Union, were dangerous, along with Libertarians and Constitution Party members.

The MIAC report also detailed the ‘public safety’ partnership with local, state and federal agencies, which would disseminate information to Homeland Security on these alleged threats to the nation which also included Christians and homeschoolers.  The leaked information also exposed the fact that there were reports across the country sent to other local and state law enforcement agencies;  which might explain the Deputy Sheriffs comments this week in regard to Constitutionalists being a threat.

America officially became a country declaring independence from England in 1776.  Upon this declaration, a Republic form of government was founded with the Bill of Rights and the Articles of the Constitution. It has been alleged that when a woman asked Benjamin Franklin, what these gentlemen had just accomplished, he stated “A Republic Ma’am, if you can keep it.”

The word “republic’ is derived from the Latin ‘res publica’ which literally translates to  ‘public thing’.  In relation to ‘politics’ it means a form of government for which the people conduct their private lives for their own benefit versus the benefit for a dictator or group of politicians.  Thus a Republic form of government allows for FREEDOM and Liberty clearly described in not only the Founding Documents of America, but also in the words, via letters, books, and speeches, of the Founding Fathers.

Back in 2009, I spoke at a Constitution Party event in Arizona.  Others speakers included Chuck Baldwin and former Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo.  I clearly recall Tancredo stating (in reference to the Ron Paul ‘revolution’) there had already been a ‘revolution’ and they (the statists) won.

Indeed this seems to be the case if Americans, who adhere to our history and laws of the land, are considered “threats to the state” (or statists!).

Perhaps George Orwell wrote ‘fiction’ back in 1949, but in 2014, his book “1984” reads more like a manuscript of reality.  If we want to be AMERICA again, we must stand up with courage instead of bowing down with fear!